<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paws for Thought &#187; Brand Structure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.adamsstrategy.com/tag/brand-structure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.adamsstrategy.com</link>
	<description>The ADAMS Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:18:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>General Motors: the comeback begins with the brand</title>
		<link>http://blog.adamsstrategy.com/2009/06/general-motors-the-comeback-begins-with-the-brand/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.adamsstrategy.com/2009/06/general-motors-the-comeback-begins-with-the-brand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ken Cochrane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing Communications Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paws For Thought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Positioning Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.branding-strategy-consulting.com/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[General Motors needs to focus as much on repositioning their brand as they need to rescue themselves from bankruptcy. GM has become a company of disparate brands. The apparent rationale behind the brand structure appears to be an attempt to cover all possible markets. This please all mentality has resulted in General Motors failing to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>General Motors needs to focus as much on repositioning their brand as they need to rescue themselves from bankruptcy. GM has become a company of disparate brands. The apparent rationale behind the brand structure appears to be an attempt to cover all possible markets. This <em>please all</em> mentality has resulted in General Motors failing to claim a strong, clearly articulated position. The strategy has led to mixed messages, general brand dilution, and products misaligned with consumer demand.</p>
<p>The Obama administration has insisted GM remake itself into a company of fuel efficiency, a friend of the environment, and a producer of quality products. Now in bankruptcy, they’ll eventually emerge with new financing and equity structures, new union contracts and government guarantees, less workers, less dealers, and less models. That could be the easy work.</p>
<p>Now, GM will have to convince the American consumer that they really are a <em>new</em> and <em>different</em> company. Not the company of trucks, SUVs, and large cars.</p>
<p>America has evolved and will continue to evolve.</p>
<p>The made in America label only goes so far. With new generations it carries less and less weight. Americans enjoy the right to buy what they want. Loyalty to a mismanaged colossus producing products misaligned with consumer demand will take a long time to develop.</p>
<p>Though they are in the midst of a predicament, GM’s senior management needs to get to work on the new brand. What will they promise to their marketplace? Will they be able to deliver it? This time there won’t be a second chance. Call it cultural or attitude, the new brand needs to be established and the employees have to buy into it with fervor. Then the consumer needs to come around and buy GM vehicles. Only then will GM have a chance of making it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.adamsstrategy.com/2009/06/general-motors-the-comeback-begins-with-the-brand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
